沒清楚，一切都沒清楚

小女孩的爸爸和小男孩的媽媽在一個廠上班。小女孩的爸爸喝醉了酒耽誤了上班，小男孩的媽媽就頂了他的班，結果出事故死了。
雙方的爸爸都有了心理問題。
於是，他們both禁止小男孩和小女孩來往。
小男孩的爸爸跟小男孩之間有有一次談話：
Dad：I wiII not aIIow him or his daughter in this house. I wiII not aIIow you to spend time with her, doing projects or whatever it is that you do. That's it. I hope we're cIear on that.

The Boy：We're not cIear.

Dad：What'd you say?

The Boy：We're not cIear. You and I aren't cIear about anything. We couIdn't be Iess cIear. Just because Mom died doesn't mean you know anything about me. You don't. You don't know anything about AIice, either. She's kind.

Dad：We're not gonna have this discussion right now.

The Boy：She's nice to me!

Dad： I don't care what she is! Her father is an irresponsibIe, seIfish son of a bitch. You Iisten to me. I've got 12,000 peopIe in this town who are scared out of their mind. They've got one person to reIy on.It used to be someone eIse, but now it's just me.

這是一次不成功的交談。小男孩爸爸的話中包含了這樣一個推論過程：小女孩的爸爸是壞蛋，所以禁止小男孩和其家庭中任何人交往（這裡特指小女孩Alice）。小男孩回復這個問題的時候，並沒有抓住對方這個推論中的錯誤來反駁，卻另提出一個立論「你不了解我，你也不了解Alice」，由於話題之間或者「論駁」之間太過鬆散，結果談話不了了之。
這種類型的對話，需要讓對方澄清。在小男孩爸爸的話中，他並沒有明確說出推論句式。所以要問他：「是因為她爸爸是壞蛋，所以你不讓她來我們家，不讓我我跟她交往嗎？」。之後還可以進一步問：「你是說因為她爸爸是壞蛋，所以她也不好嗎？」或者「是因為你不喜歡他們，所以你也不允許我跟他們交往嗎？」這樣把對方的每一個推論和想法都明確出來時，就可以輕而易舉地駁倒他們。