[轉自IMBD] Yep, as BAD as the critics are saying

by pieginodino » Sat Aug 3 2013 20:36:05
IMDb member since June 2005

The overall writing and character beats are quite bad and I seriously wonder what Denzel 華盛頓 was thinking when he agreed to do this film. This movie perfectly fits the atrocious run that Mark Wahlberg is on adding to the awful string of Contraband, Broken City and Pain & Gain. They took an intriguing concept of two undercover agents working not knowing either is the law and turned it in to a mindless and moronic mess. This thing screams "bad over-the-top film" at every turn. The ending is as dumb as any I』ve seen in years. The two leads exhibit nothing but crazed luck and a genuine lack of intelligence throughout the entire running time. Two points for Denzel's always glorious screen presence, one point for some good one liners and one point for the Paula Patton nude scene. That's all this movie has to offer.
整個故事劇情和人物節奏都爛透了，真不明白丹澤爾華盛頓接這部戲的時候腦子想啥來著。馬克沃爾伯格在這部戲裡的殘暴表演和他在『禁運品』，『破碎之城』還有『付出與收穫』里一個德行。他們把一個本來挺有意思的『兩個臥底不知道對方身份一起犯罪』這麼一個創意糟蹋變成了愚蠢加腦殘大集合。就是這麼一個充斥著言過其實的表演的爛玩意。影片的結尾時近幾年我看過的裡面最二的。這倆主演在整個影片裡充分地展示了什麼叫狗屎運以及毫無智商。兩星算是給丹澤爾一貫光輝的螢幕形象吧，一星給幾處還算俏皮的台詞，一星給寶拉巴頓的全裸鏡頭。這部電影就這麼點玩意。

評論一：
by rabiddog67 » Sun Aug 4 2013 11:12:33
IMDb member since October 2001

It still opened at number one for all your whining. And it is a good action film. not meant to be Shakespeare as it is adapted from a comic book.
你發這麼多牢騷人家票房還是首位好嗎？（這句話不知道怎麼翻譯其實。。）這明明是部不錯的動作片。一個漫畫改變的電影你還指望它像莎士比亞的作品一樣深邃？

評論二：
by chapterstudios-382-670768 » Sun Aug 4 2013 11:27:09
IMDb member since May 2012

Why is it no one can criticize an action movie without someone pulling the "its not supposed to be a world changing Shakespearian deep movie" card?
怎麼一評價動作片就老有人非要提『別指望它像莎士比亞那些改變世界的作品』這件事兒？誰能不提！

評論三：
by magerk4 » Sun Aug 4 2013 15:49:21
IMDb member since August 2003

Notice how no one ever said that about Die Hard or Terminator 2. A great movie is a great movie, doesn't matter if it's a cartoon, an action flick or grossout comedy. And a piece of crap is a piece of crap.
回樓上
好像沒人說對虎膽龍威或者終結者2說過這種話。可見好電影就是好電影，無論它是卡通片，動作片或者低俗的喜劇片。這也印證了垃圾就是垃圾沒跑了。

評論四：
by Shastra » Thu Aug 8 2013 13:42:38
IMDb member since April 2005

If T2 and Die Hard came out in 2013 they would be criticized too. We live in cynical and jaded times. And thanks to the boom in internet, ever dick and harry is a critic now.

If you think this movie is piece of crap i doubt you have ever seen an actual 'piece of crap'. But please continue to exaggerate.

如果終結者2和虎膽龍威也在2013年上映，他們照樣挨批。我們現在就是生活再一個憤世嫉俗又消極厭倦的時代。感謝網際網路讓每一個愚蠢都成為了評論家。
如果你覺得這電影是垃圾，我懷疑你沒見過真正的垃圾，所以請繼續誇大其詞吧。

評論五：
by pieginodino » Thu Aug 8 2013 19:04:24
IMDb member since June 2005

Please. This thing isn't even as good as any ten minutes of T2 or Die Hard.
求求了好嗎，這玩意還沒有終結者2和虎膽龍威十分鐘的劇情好看。

評論六：
by Shastra » Fri Aug 9 2013 12:13:36
IMDb member since April 2005

And thanks for missing the point of my post.
回樓上
感謝你錯過我所表達的重點。


所以說看影評亮點什麼的永遠在評論，莎大爺不斷躺槍令人唏噓。